Getting ‘Fresh’ in the workplace

I used Amazon Fresh for the first time last week. Not for personal shopping, I should add. We needed some stim material for a foodie project and it was (not surprisingly) the fastest way to get everything. I’d already spent enough time sourcing what we needed in-store but my local supermarkets simply didn’t have the quantities I needed.  

After looking around, I tentatively checked Amazon (as you do) to see whether they could help. Indeed they could…for a fee – which was fine considering the super-quick delivery and the time it would save me. I clicked, paid and, the following day, those famous brown paper bags arrived at Razor HQ. Job done. Thank you, Amazon! 

As wonderfully simple as it all was, I couldn’t help feeling dirty about the whole transaction. Don’t get me wrong, I obviously already had an Amazon Prime account in place, so I won’t pretend that I’m a saint who’d never bought from Amazon prior to last week. Nor will I pretend that I only buy from small businesses the rest of the time. I live in London and am surrounded by high street chain stores. Shopping in crowded/noisy places stresses me out – which means I end up doing my in-store shopping late at night or early morning. Online shopping has come to my rescue many times.   

So what’s the problem? It must be the stark realisation of just how much Amazon, in particular, has taken over everyday life. It is something I’ve considered several times before, but it wasn’t until I actually bought from Fresh that it’s hit home. The idea of us buying everything from under one ‘virtual’ roof in the future suddenly feels like a much stronger possibility. It’s not one I’m that keen on – and that’s before I begin to think about what’s happening behind the scenes.  

Personally, I’m unlikely to use the service for myself. I’d much rather pick and choose my own fruit and veg. Also the staple items listed on those brown bags just aren’t me…except the prosecco – I’ll give ’em that one.   

Amazon

Embrace failure!

Last month, the world’s first museum dedicated to failure, opened its doors in Helsingborg, Sweden. Rather than ridiculing its innovators and their ideas, the space explores reasons for failure and sees these mistakes as learning opportunities.

Working in the world of innovation research for the past decade, we recognise the importance our clients put on crafting winning concepts and getting these to market as quickly as possible. As we know, corporations place emphasis on speed – but how does this allow for any time for meaningful reflection? Launches that fail to make targets are quickly delisted or disbanded, and brand managers fired or moved swiftly onto the next big thing. Rather than covering up mistakes, companies should encourage a culture where small failures are noted before they become much larger.

One reason why innovations exhibited at the Museum of Failure didn’t make the cut was a refusal to accept that the market or category would change. Be it the world’s first digital camera by Kodak launched in 1995 – the board deemed that their corporation was in the business of film photography and that they underestimated the role for online photo sharing. Or conversely, Blockbusters that went bust in 2010 because it refused to acknowledge or accept the death of movie cassettes unlike Netflix that posted movies to people’s homes before investing in streaming. How the story might have been different for these two companies, had they allowed an innovation unit to flourish, challenged with the mantra to obliterate or transform their current business. In fact, that’s exactly how we see start-ups and kick-starter projects rise to success so quickly. These companies need to take the challenger stance, so why can’t big corporations do the same?

The companies that we see winning in the innovation space are those that allow themselves to make mistakes and aren’t shy in sharing these with their team. They see the process of innovation as iterative, and are always evolving. Sometimes it’s just one element that needs tweaking. Too often early ideas that fail in research are discarded but with a little more reflection and bravery, they could flourish.

Find ways to inject a bit of healthy competition within your business to learn from failure. Next time you embark on a piece of innovation, consider multiple work streams that vie against each other with significantly, different approaches. Rather than worrying about the competition, look internally at how you can transform your business to reset the parameters of consumption and experience.

For more information on how Razor Research can transform your business, or aid your innovation research, contact me at lesley@razorresearch.co.uk.

Strong and stable recruitment

Earlier this year, James Diggle of Dig Fieldcraft came to us with a cracking idea for a training project. 

The idea: A mock short-term online community with freelance market research recruiters acting as participants.
The plan: By seeing the process through the eyes of a participant, recruiters should have more empathy for participants – along with a better understanding of the recruitment/research experience.
The end goal: Higher quality recruitment for online communities.

And so the Razor-Dig dream team was born! James rounded up the troops while we focussed on the research design and community structure. We ran the community for 3 days, with everything set up as if it were a real FMCG project for a client – including tasks that real community participants would have to complete. 

At the end we gave them an open-ended questionnaire to complete. This gave us rich insight into a) what recruiters understand the purpose of online communities to be, b) common issues they face when recruiting this methodology, and c) new learnings that emerged from having taken part in a community themselves.

From this feedback we created a ‘best practice’ checklist for online community recruiters to bear in mind and submitted a joint paper to the AQR – who then invited us to speak at this year’s AQR Conference as part of a panel focussing on recruitment issues!  

Ta-da!
And here are our seven tips from recruiters for successful online communities:

1. Know your timings
It’s easy to misjudge timings when creating task-based projects for participants to complete independently. It’s also tempting to downplay task length and how long you think it might take a respondent to complete one of your exercises.

Takeaway: Think harder (and longer) about how long your tasks will take. Overestimate where possible.   

2. Be mindful of potentially controversial tasks (i.e. selfie videos)
Auto-ethnography is such a valuable asset to have in our toolkit. But without a skilled moderator there ‘in the flesh’ to help build trust, participants might become uncomfortable by tasks involving selfie videos for example. 

Takeaway: Participants should be told beforehand if they will be required to take photos and videos of themselves.

3. Beware of undeclared extras
Exercises that involve buying something, any kind of excursion, spending time with or taking photos of friends/family almost always mean additional time, strain, and cost for participants.

Takeaway: If you have any unusual extras in your tasks, set your expectations with participants beforehand! It’s only fair that they’re aware of the level of contribution expected from them.

4. Be tech savvy
Not all participants will have laptops, webcams, or mobiles with the latest operating system. Recruiters occasionally find out – after participants have been recruited – that the project cannot go ahead without specific technical requirements like this. 

Takeaway: Find out about the technical requirements of the platform(s) you’ll be using and communicate it clearly to field and potential recruits.

5. Plan for spam
Email spam systems are an easily forgotten vulnerability for logistical hiccups. All sorts of problems could occur if participants are not appropriately warned about what emails to expect and how to appropriately manipulate their spam settings.

Takeaway: Understand the notification system of the platform you’re using and teach participants how to add the email address to their email provider’s ‘white list’.

6. It’s good to talk
With many modern recruitment techniques, it is possible to get through much of the process online. Due to all the potential controversies mentioned above, we must be extra careful that participants have actually read the description and are fully happy and prepared to take part in projects.

Takeaway: Always have a thorough screening call with potential participants to ensure we have their full, informed consent.

7. Provide a clear definition of an online community
‘Online community’ is a relatively new and very nebulous term. It can mean a variety of different techniques and has a variety of uses within research. If we don’t explain to recruiters what it is we really mean by it, they may struggle describing this to potential recruits. (And the recruiters told us that they are rarely provided with such an explanation.)

Takeaway: Give recruiters a couple of sentences which they can use to succinctly explain, to potential participants, what an online community is.








(A summary of Razor & Dig Fieldcraft’s submission to the AQR Conference 2017: 7 Tips from recruiters for successful online communities.)

Future focusing

As qualitative researchers, we are always looking for new techniques and ways of thinking to help us get to the heart of the research in question with consumers. So we read, with great interest, an article in The New York Times entitled ‘We Aren’t Built to Live in the Moment’ by Martin E. P. Seligman & John Tierney.

The article is based on a paper written by Seligman and colleagues called Homo Prospectus which introduces an emerging field of study called ‘Prospective Psychology’. The field aims to explore our unique ability as human beings to engage in ‘prospection: the mental simulation of future possibilities’.  Essentially, it’s a form of day-dreaming.

Put simply (because I’m no academic!), the article argues that we aren’t simply creatures of habit as we often tend to believe. Rather that we are constantly, and actively, seeking information from our environment and experiences to develop our own set of possible future actions and resulting outcomes – which ultimately help us to decide how to behave. And we do all of this in no time at all – often at a subconscious level!

I think the easiest way that the authors explain their position is in terms of mental health disorders and potential treatment. They posit that those suffering from depression, for example, struggle to recover not necessarily because they are dogged by past experiences, but that they could actually struggle to imagine a different outcome in the future and thus the types of behaviours that would lead to that outcome.

So why is this interesting for us and our clients?

Well, much like psychology, qualitative research typically focuses on past or present experiences to understand consumer behaviour; in many instances asking consumers to recount a previous or current purchase/brand experience. So the focus is always, ‘What did you do, why did you do it and how could the brand do better?’. While this approach works well for some types of research, it can pose limitations when trying to understand how to disrupt consumer behaviour and encourage switching (i.e. to another brand/service provider).

What if we changed how we asked our questions to try and get consumers to think from a future-focused perspective to uncover the more subconscious perceptions, expectations and other influencers that might impact their motivations and barriers towards a particular brand?

For example, when exploring customer journeys, the focus tends to be on understanding recent experience and pain points. But what if we asked consumers to imagine ‘what could happen’ when they interact with a particular brand and ‘what could the steps in the journey look like to create the best experience?’

Or, when understanding how to disrupt consumer behaviour, why not change the outcome for them and get them to imagine how they would have got there? I.e. ‘Imagine that you’ve just purchased X from X brand and are feeling good about your experience. Talk us through what would have to happen to get you to that brand and how your interaction would go.’.

Could this change in approach help us to uncover unmet needs and expectations and help our clients develop strategies that are more aligned with future behaviour? Watch this space…

The most Danish lager in the world…

When I say the word ‘probably’, I’d wager that a good proportion of you reading this would think of Carlsberg. ‘Probably the best lager in the world’ is one of the most famous, and most often quoted, brand slogans of our times. Truth be told however, Carlsberg has had a tough time of it of late. With a seemingly endless array of exotic world and craft beers arriving on the scene, it’s been struggling to live up to such a bold claim.

Something needed to be done in order to reignite interest in this great brand. Something that would rekindle the love we’ve all had for it over the years and re-build its credibility. In short, something that encouraged consumers to believe, once again, that Carlsberg is the best lager in the world…probably! 

That’s where Razor came in. Working closely with Carlsberg – and with their creative agencies (branding, design, and comms) over an 18-month time period – we embarked on a collective mission to help consumers fall back in love with Carlsberg. Pivotal to this was the need to create a more authentic and relevant brand story.

As luck would have it, there’s recently been a huge appetite and intrigue in all things Scandi in the UK. The Danish concept of hygge for example has been everywhere – in bookshops, in newspaper supplements, coffee houses and fashion stores up and down the country. But back when it was a mere glint in the eye of publishing editors, we were busy exploring what it meant to consumers – together with the other aspects of ‘Danishness’. 

So, we had ‘Scandimania’ sweeping the nation and we had a Danish beer brand currently not well known for its Danish roots. It wasn’t too difficult to join the dots and see the opportunity. Consumer research firmly validated the enormous potential for a provenance-based platform for Carlsberg. The question was…how could we best activate it?

We decided to run a ‘cultural intelligence session’. This involved bringing together a group of Danes based in London – people with enough experience of both cultures – to help enrich our understanding of the Danish way of life and, importantly, how it compares and contrasts to life in the UK. This was an informal workshop session which included clients and agency folk over a few beers (and gluten-free Danish snacks). Not only was the workshop immensely illuminating, throwing up dimensions of Danish-ness we’d not even conceived, but we also got to hang out with a bunch of cool people! If you’ve never met one, the Danish are thoroughly, thoroughly nice people!

Next up was a further round of consumer research in the UK. Turns out that most Brits struggle to tell the difference between Denmark and Sweden, can’t tell you what Denmark’s landscape looks like (clue: it isn’t mountainous), nor what culture they’ve exported to the world (no Lars von Tier, no Vinterberg). That said, the UK has a very positive view of Scandi people; smart, well educated, happy, forthright, and stylish. In fact, two phrases that really hit the spot when trying to sum them up were ‘effortlessly stylish’ and ‘refreshingly direct’; both of which were deemed to have potential for aligning with Carlsberg.   

Once the Scandi platform was confirmed, it was agreed that Carlsberg Export would be the best vehicle for the new positioning. Despite falling off the radar somewhat with consumers, it was still seen as a premium brand with a known Danish backstory (derived from historic advertising). It commands a great deal of respect in terms of product and consistently outperforms many of its rivals in blind taste tests. This ‘diamond in the rough’ was therefore felt to be the perfect solution to leverage the provenance story most effectively.

It was clear that if Carlsberg Export and the Carlsberg brand stood any chance of being reappraised, it would need a radically new visual identity and comms platform for the brand. Research involved us testing various executions of font, bottle, and glassware evoking the minimalist beauty and style of Scandinavia (using various iterations of wood, wood-effects, pure white backdrops, brushed steel etc). This led to the creation of a final design route that has gone way beyond expectations in terms of delivering authenticity and quality cues, whilst carving out a truly differentiated positioning for the brand. In tandem with this, Carlsberg also developed a launch advertising campaign.

As the Carlsberg team prepares to introduce its new Danish positioning, we at Razor are immensely proud to have had a hand in the development of its new identity. We’ve used research creatively and flexibly throughout the journey, listening carefully to consumers and applying insights sensitively.   

We’re really hoping the Danish positioning will re-ignite some love for the brand. In fact, we think it’s a winner. Probably.

Carlsberg-TVC-Stills-6.1

Meditation…in moderation

I’ve always been drawn towards the idea of meditation. Not so much for the spiritual side of it, but more with a view to quieting the mind and gaining greater focus on what’s right in front of me. Like all budding qualitative researchers I go from moderating groups, to writing debriefs, and jumping between projects. I consider meditation an invaluable skill in our line of work.

A few months back I attended a weekend course on Vedic meditation with 20 other individuals. We all signed up for different reasons, but shared an eagerness to learn how to make meditation part of our everyday lives. Since then, I have slowly developed my own practice. It’s still inconsistent – and there are days I don’t manage to find time for it – but I’ve realised that, as with all important things, you have to prioritise it. So I now get out of bed earlier or nip into one of the phone booths at work during lunch. I’ve noticed that when I do this my mind is clearer and I feel even more engaged with what I am doing.

Throughout this process I’ve started to wonder whether there are techniques or tools that could be derived from meditation, or indeed mindfulness, which could be used in qualitative research.

While I can’t imagine any scenario where we would ask respondents to sit and meditate before a group(!), I did attend AQR Spark’s Stop, Breathe, and Be (a mindfulness for moderators workshop). There we were asked to close our eyes while eating a piece of popcorn and to focus our thoughts on what we were experiencing. Going around the group afterwards, many felt they were recalling a deeper response where they were able to more clearly articulate their thoughts on the experience. I left feeling that there might be potential to incorporate similar techniques into our qualitative work. For example, focussing the minds of respondents on the task or topic at hand, or perhaps using it as a warm-up task in client workshops.

But the courage is in having the conviction to try it out! While meditation and mindfulness have a greater awareness and presence in today’s mainstream consciousness, there is a sense (I would argue) that it’s still something associated with ‘hippy’ culture. Thus it would be hard to sell to clients as a qualitative technique or a valid thing to spend five minutes of a focus group on. My hope is that, over time, we will start to draw in techniques from other similar disciplines to enhance the quality of the conversations we have and, ultimately, the insights we deliver to our clients.

crystal ball

 

Note to self:

I love the MRS Conference. I love spending two days surrounded by my comrades. I love my annual catch-ups with the same people I always vow to have lunch with within the next 365 days, and then don’t. I feel lucky that it’s become part of my annual social (and intellectual) calendar.

I love the fact that however hard the organising committee strive (I assume) to lay ‘theme’ across submissions and sessions (this year it was Impact with a capital ‘I’), it’s often delightfully hijacked by global and local fissures along with the sheer will, velocity, and personality of the keynote speakers – who in my view were more stellar this year than ever before.  Okay, it might have been cheaper to watch some TED talks or go to a ‘how to…’ event to see people like Oliver James, Caitlin Moran, Dan Snow, and Hannah Fry…but choosers shouldn’t be sniffy beggars.

The themes that bubbled up eloquently amongst the speakers and panellists (and are now simmering away in my intellect):

  • You should say the word disruption a lot nowadays. If you say disruption with emphasis, you will look as if you are a disruptor. That makes you look like a jolly good thing and quite an important person. I am not very disruptive.
    Note to self: work on that.
  • Being ethical is also a jolly good thing. The more ethical you are, the more people will like you and the more they will buy your stuff if you are a big company.
    Note to self: hone ethics.
  • The internet might implode soon. Or it might not implode soon, but something has to happen at some point because all the famous people who are on the internet are tired of the lawless wild wester-y (or should that be Westeros?) of it all. I have yet to be trolled so I probably shouldn’t complain.
    Note to self: don’t comment – just in case. 
  • Being a woman is another good thing. If you were a woman at this year’s conference you were lauded and celebrated for simply turning up. I’m totally up for sisterhood in principle. I’m just not great at group hugs.
  • Finally, David Bowie will reign long in the hearts and minds of researchers. I pity the other dearly departed of the last year as they quite simply didn’t get a mention. Who knew market research was so zig and zag? Maybe it happened when I wasn’t looking. 
    Note to self: be more Bowie.

Clipboards? What clipboards?

There’s a running joke within the research industry. It’s that nobody grew up planning to be here – we all just sort of fell into it. So whose role is it to attract fresh young talent to our industry? There is so much for market research to be proud of and we must start shouting about what we do.

On Monday, I spoke at the MRS Graduate Roadshow. It’s an initiative led by Ken and Trish Parker. The roadshow travels,with recently graduated researchers, to universities across the country. They introduce and explain our roles along with the type of projects/brands we work on. The group of marketing students I met at Oxford Brookes love brands but actually knew very little about market research.

There is still a certain ‘clipboard on the street’ stigma attached to our industry – and many people associate us with it. For this particular group of students who claim to love brand strategy and development, there was much confusion around what market research is. Perhaps in line with their out-dated perceptions.

After talking to them for 15 minutes, explaining the broad work we do, I certainly got the feeling they begun to understand the exciting opportunities within research. They were actively embracing the possibility of being able to work on multiple brands across varied projects. These students are looking into careers in branding/advertising/marketing when, in fact, much of what they’re interested in is covered by research.

The MRS Graduate Roadshow is doing great work at highlighting consumer research and the influential work we do, but I think it’s time for stronger action. As an industry do we take enough credit for it? Let’s stand up, be proud, and start turning heads!

Screen Shot 2017-03-15 at 12.49.34